Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #58,847 of 84,120 nationally
Newcastle Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06061020501 · Placer, CA · pop 2,795 · 23% of tract blocks fall in Newcastle
Census tract 06061020501 is in Newcastle, California. It has a population of 2,795 and an eviction-risk score of 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). 44% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 29% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,625/month against a median household income of $128,500 — roughly 15% rent-to-income at the medians.
Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,074
Renter share11.1%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$128,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
14
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
4
th percentile
Very Low
National
30
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Newcastle and the region
Centroid at 38.8880, -121.1495 · click any tract to drill in
Why Newcastle scores 4.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Newcastle
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,625 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Newcastle
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Newcastle
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Newcastle
5.7
How Newcastle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 31%Socioeconomic
- 30%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 70%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.6%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.4%Food insecurity
- 7.6%SNAP enrollment
- 5.3%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 15.2%Frequent mental distress
- 27.1%Any disability
Frequently asked
About tract 06061020501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06061020501?
Census tract 06061020501 in Newcastle scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06061020501?
Median gross rent is $1,625/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06061020501?
6.9% of residents in tract 06061020501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,795.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06061020501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 30th, minority 32th, housing 70th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06061020501 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06061020501 compare to Newcastle overall?
Tract 06061020501 scores 4.7/10 — right in line with the parent city of Newcastle at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Newcastle; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related