Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #70,070 of 84,120 nationally

Long Grove Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 17097864515 · Lake County, IL · pop 2,960 · 48% of tract blocks fall in Long Grove

Census tract 17097864515 is in Long Grove, Illinois. It has a population of 2,960 and an eviction-risk score of 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). 0% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 0% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $2,707/month against a median household income of $181,500 — roughly 18% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 4% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units978
Renter share3.9%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate0.7%
Median income$181,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank — 50th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 1 tracts In Long Grove
Moderate
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank — 8th percentileBottomTop
#147 of 159 tracts In Lake County
Very Low
Within state
8 th percentile
Rank — 8th percentileBottomTop
#2,988 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very Low
National
17 th percentile
Rank — 17th percentileBottomTop
#70,070 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Grove and the region

Centroid at 42.1716, -87.9966 · click any tract to drill in

Why Long Grove scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Grove
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
0.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,707 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Grove
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Grove
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Grove
3.6

How Long Grove compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Long Grove risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 864515Long Grove: 4.84.8Long Groveparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.45.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Frequently asked

About tract 17097864515

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17097864515?

Census tract 17097864515 in Long Grove scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17097864515?

Median gross rent is $2,707/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17097864515?

0.7% of residents in tract 17097864515 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,960.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17097864515?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 47th, minority 45th, housing 9th.

Q5

What share of households in tract 17097864515 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q6

How does tract 17097864515 compare to Long Grove overall?

Tract 17097864515 scores 4.2/10 — lower than the parent city of Long Grove at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Grove; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Related