Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally
Carlisle-Rockledge Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 01055011002 · Etowah County, AL · pop 5,306 · 30% of tract blocks fall in Carlisle-Rockledge
Here is how census tract 01055011002, in Carlisle-Rockledge, looks to a landlord: a 4.6/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 5,306. That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
41% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $765 a month against an average household income of $51,875 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,827
Renter share16.0%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate15.1%
Median income$51,875
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
34
th percentile
Low
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
National
45
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Carlisle-Rockledge and the region
Centroid at 34.1197, -86.1655 · click any tract to drill in
Why Carlisle-Rockledge scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Carlisle-Rockledge
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.5
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
15.1% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$765 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Carlisle-Rockledge
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Carlisle-Rockledge
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Carlisle-Rockledge
4.1
How Carlisle-Rockledge compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 73%Socioeconomic
- 72%Household composition
- 2%Racial/ethnic minority
- 15%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 99Total filings over 16 yrs
- 2.47%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.1%Peak (2006)
- 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.2%Housing insecurity
- 8.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.0%Food insecurity
- 11.8%SNAP enrollment
- 8.9%Transit barriers
- 10.6%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 39.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Carlisle-Rockledge
The score leans hardest on housing court bias at 4.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Carlisle-Rockledge, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Etowah County average of 4.9 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 99 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 2.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.1% of renter households in 2006.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 01055011002
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01055011002?
Census tract 01055011002 in Carlisle-Rockledge scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01055011002?
Median gross rent is $765/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01055011002?
15.1% of residents in tract 01055011002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,306.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01055011002?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 72th, minority 2th, housing 15th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01055011002?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 99 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 01055011002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.47% of renter households, peaking at 5.1% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 01055011002 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 01055011002 compare to Carlisle-Rockledge overall?
Tract 01055011002 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Carlisle-Rockledge at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Carlisle-Rockledge; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related