Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Concord Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 01073014001 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,709 · 35% of tract blocks fall in Concord

The Moderate-tier score of 4.7/10 for census tract 01073014001 reflects conditions in Concord, Alabama. That is riskier than about 30% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $833 a month against an average household income of $67,792 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 6% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,471
Renter share10.7%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$67,792

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Concord
Moderate
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#138 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Low
Within state
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#1,124 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
National
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#58,384 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Concord and the region

Centroid at 33.4698, -87.0603 · click any tract to drill in

Why Concord scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Concord
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$833 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
1.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
4.1

How Concord compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Concord risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 014001Concord: 2.12.1Concordparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 44Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 5.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.5%Peak (2016)
  • 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010730140012000: 4 filings (7.02/100 renter HHs)2001: 3 filings (5.27/100 renter HHs)2002: 4 filings (7.02/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (5.27/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (10.25/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (12.81/100 renter HHs)2012: 5 filings (1.47/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (0.29/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (1.18/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (0.88/100 renter HHs)2016: 8 filings (5.52/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 100% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Concord

The score leans hardest on housing court bias at 4.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Concord, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 44 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 5.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.5% of renter households in 2016.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073014001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073014001?

Census tract 01073014001 in Concord scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073014001?

Median gross rent is $833/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073014001?

10.1% of residents in tract 01073014001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,709.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073014001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 12th, minority 14th, housing 10th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073014001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 44 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073014001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.18% of renter households, peaking at 5.5% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 01073014001 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01073014001 compare to Concord overall?

Tract 01073014001 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Concord at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related