Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Vance Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 01125010703 · Tuscaloosa County, AL · pop 3,334 · 32% of tract blocks fall in Vance

For landlords sizing up Vance in Tuscaloosa County, census tract 01125010703 carries a lower eviction-risk score of 3.2/10. On the national scale it ranks #81,348 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 10% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $736 monthly, set against $79,600 in average yearly household income, roughly 11% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 13% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,158
Renter share14.9%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$79,600

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Vance
Moderate
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#53 of 59 tracts In Tuscaloosa County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#1,252 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very Low
National
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Vance and the region

Centroid at 33.1845, -87.2514 · click any tract to drill in

Why Vance scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Vance
2.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$736 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Vance
3.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Vance
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Vance
3.8

How Vance compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Vance risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 010703Vance: 2.02.0Vanceparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 28Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 3.68%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.0%Peak (2003)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 011250107032001: 1 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 7 filings (7.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 8 filings (8.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 3 filings (1.60/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (2.67/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (1.83/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 300% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Vance

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Vance, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Tuscaloosa County average of 4.7 and below the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 28 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 3.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.0% of renter households in 2003.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 01125010703

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01125010703?

Census tract 01125010703 in Vance scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01125010703?

Median gross rent is $736/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 10% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01125010703?

6.5% of residents in tract 01125010703 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,334.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01125010703?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 73th, minority 39th, housing 20th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01125010703?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 28 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 01125010703 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.68% of renter households, peaking at 8.0% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 01125010703 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01125010703 compare to Vance overall?

Tract 01125010703 scores 2.5/10, higher than the parent city of Vance at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Vance; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related