Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally

Landmark Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 05119004004 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 3,934 · 51% of tract blocks fall in Landmark

Here is how census tract 05119004004, in Landmark, looks to a landlord: a 6.2/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,934. It lands near the 82nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

59% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $547 a month against an average household income of $60,566 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 5% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,369
Renter share12.0%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate35.8%
Median income$60,566

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Landmark
Very Low
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 107 tracts In Pulaski County
High
Within state
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#158 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
High
National
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#13,119 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Landmark and the region

Centroid at 34.5957, -92.3092 · click any tract to drill in

Why Landmark scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Landmark
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
35.8% poverty · this tract
8.9
Supply constraint
$547 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Landmark
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Landmark
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Landmark
9.6

How Landmark compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Landmark risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 004004Landmark: 2.52.5Landmarkparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Landmark

The heaviest input here is housing court bias at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Landmark, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 17.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 53rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 05119004004

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119004004?

Census tract 05119004004 in Landmark scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05119004004?

Median gross rent is $547/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05119004004?

35.8% of residents in tract 05119004004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,934.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05119004004?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 50th, minority 33th, housing 47th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 05119004004 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 05119004004 compare to Landmark overall?

Tract 05119004004 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Landmark at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Landmark; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Landmark

Top eight tracts in Landmark ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related