Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Rosedale Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 06029003823 · Kern, CA · pop 4,487 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Rosedale

Eviction risk in Rosedale centers on tract 06029003823, which scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 4,487 residents. That is riskier than roughly 51% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 19% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,060 a month while the average household earns $180,450 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 18% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,469
Renter share21.9%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate0.7%
Median income$180,450

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Rosedale
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#235 of 236 tracts In Kern
Very Low
Within state
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#8,899 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#69,776 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosedale and the region

Centroid at 35.3693, -119.2143 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosedale scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rosedale
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
0.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,060 rent vs county FMR
9.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosedale
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosedale
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosedale
5.6

How Rosedale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosedale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 003823Rosedale: 7.67.6Rosedaleparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosedale

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 9.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosedale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Kern County average of 6.1 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06029003823

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06029003823?

Census tract 06029003823 in Rosedale scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06029003823?

Median gross rent is $2,060/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 19% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06029003823?

0.7% of residents in tract 06029003823 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,487.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06029003823?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 42th, minority 58th, housing 31th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06029003823 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06029003823 compare to Rosedale overall?

Tract 06029003823 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Rosedale at 7.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosedale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rosedale

Top eight tracts in Rosedale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related