Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #2,438 of 84,120 nationally

Lynwood Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06037540202 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 6,888

The Elevated-tier score of 6.4/10 for census tract 06037540202 reflects conditions in Lynwood, California. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

64% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,684 monthly, set against $60,472 in average yearly household income, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 72% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 26% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,597
Renter share72.3%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate16.3%
Median income$60,472

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 12 tracts In Lynwood
Moderate
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#661 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#1,113 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
National
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#2,438 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lynwood and the region

Centroid at 33.9339, -118.2061 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lynwood scores 7.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lynwood
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
16.3% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,684 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lynwood
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lynwood
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lynwood
8.0

How Lynwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lynwood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.87.8This tracttract 540202Lynwood: 8.58.5Lynwoodparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lynwood

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lynwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037540202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037540202?

Census tract 06037540202 in Lynwood scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037540202?

Median gross rent is $1,684/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037540202?

16.3% of residents in tract 06037540202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,888.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037540202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 59th, minority 97th, housing 99th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037540202 struggle to pay rent?

About 32.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037540202 compare to Lynwood overall?

Tract 06037540202 scores 7.8/10, lower than the parent city of Lynwood at 8.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lynwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 06037540202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lynwood

Top eight tracts in Lynwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related