Tract 06097153602 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06097153602 · Sonoma, CA · pop 3,824
Eviction risk in Sonoma in Sonoma County centers on tract 06097153602, which scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 3,824 residents. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
53% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 43% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,231 a month against an average household income of $160,962 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sonoma and the region
Centroid at 38.4152, -122.8986 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 06097153602 scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 06097153602 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 36
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 29%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 74%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.5%Food insecurity
- 7.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 4.4%No health insurance
- 13.7%Frequent mental distress
- 27.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 06097153602
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by California eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Sonoma County average of 5.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.