Census Tract · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally
McIntosh Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 12083000203 ·
Marion, FL · pop 1,386 · 41% of tract blocks fall in McIntosh
McIntosh is where census tract 12083000203 sits, home to 1,386 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 4.1/10. That is riskier than roughly 14% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 10% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,321 a month against an average household income of $71,304 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 25% of occupied homes.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 22%Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units466
Renter share24.7%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate27.1%
Median income$71,304
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In McIntosh
Moderate
Within county
53th percentile
#44 of 93 tracts In Marion
Moderate
Within state
70th percentile
#1,537 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
National
53th percentile
#39,389 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across McIntosh and the region
Centroid at 29.4501, -82.2503 · click any tract to drill in
Why McIntosh scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from McIntosh
6.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
27.1% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$1,321 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from McIntosh
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from McIntosh
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from McIntosh
3.6
How McIntosh compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is economic stress at 6.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from McIntosh, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Marion County average of 4.8 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 58th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12083000203
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12083000203?
Census tract 12083000203 in McIntosh scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12083000203?
Median gross rent is $1,321/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 10% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12083000203?
27.1% of residents in tract 12083000203 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,386.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12083000203?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 88th, minority 64th, housing 74th.
Q5
How does tract 12083000203 compare to McIntosh overall?
Tract 12083000203 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of McIntosh at 1.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from McIntosh; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.