Tract 26121002702 Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 26121002702 · Muskegon County, MI · pop 3,389
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 26121002702 (Muskegon in Muskegon County, Michigan) comes in at 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 78% of US census tracts.
About 64% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 50% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,038 monthly, set against $70,732 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Muskegon County and the region
Centroid at 43.1958, -86.1658 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 26121002702 scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 26121002702 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 43%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 7%Racial/ethnic minority
- 60%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.9%Housing insecurity
- 9.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.6%Food insecurity
- 16.9%SNAP enrollment
- 9.0%Transit barriers
- 7.9%No health insurance
- 19.7%Frequent mental distress
- 33.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 26121002702
What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Michigan eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Muskegon County average of 5.9 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.