Skip to content
Eviction risk map of Osceola County, Michigan showing Low risk at 3.1/10
County brief·Updated June 25, 2026

Osceola County, Michigan Eviction Risk: Low

6 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Reed City (3.4) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
3.1
LOW

Ranked #33 of 83 MI counties

6k residents · 6 cities · 7 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

Osceola County eviction risk score history

Min1.7 Average2.7 Now3.1
10 5 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.1 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.2 1985 · score 2.2 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 1.7 1989 · score 1.7 1990 · score 1.8 1991 · score 1.9 1992 · score 2.4 1993 · score 2.3 1994 · score 2.3 1995 · score 2.3 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.5 2002 · score 2.6 2003 · score 2.7 2004 · score 2.6 2005 · score 2.7 2006 · score 2.7 2007 · score 2.8 2008 · score 3.3 2009 · score 3.5 2010 · score 3.6 2011 · score 3.6 2012 · score 3.5 2013 · score 3.4 2014 · score 3.3 2015 · score 3.1 2016 · score 3.1 2017 · score 3.0 2018 · score 3.0 2019 · score 3.0 2020 · score 4.2 2021 · score 4.2 2022 · score 3.3 2023 · score 3.0 2024 · score 3.1 2025 · score 3.1 2026 · score 3.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

County average of 3.1/10 (Low) spans a range of 2.6 to 3.4 across six tracked cities. The tight spread indicates no single city is driving outsized risk. 33rd of 83 Michigan counties; 32 counties carry higher eviction risk and 50 are more landlord-favorable.

How Osceola County ranks in Michigan

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
Elevated
#33 of 83 MI counties 3.1 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 61st percentileLowHigh
#33 of 83 counties in Michigan for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Moderate
#28 of 51 states (statewide) 96.2 index
Cost of living, 46th percentileLowHigh
Michigan ranks #28 of 51 states on overall cost of living (3.8% cheaper than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Moderate
#29 of 51 states (statewide) 82.3 index
Housing services cost, 44th percentileLowHigh
Michigan ranks #29 of 51 states on housing services (17.7% cheaper than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Elevated
#37 of 83 MI counties 30.6% of income
Income spent on rent, 56th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 83 counties in Michigan on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for Michigan

State-specific playbooks
Michigan Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
Michigan Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
Michigan Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
Michigan Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
Michigan Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in Osceola County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 Reed City Pop 2,517 · 24.4% income · $714 rent · Rep 2,517 2.9 24.4% $714 Rep
002 Evart Pop 1,667 · 36.0% income · $800 rent · Rep 1,667 3.4 36.0% $800 Rep
003 Marion Pop 581 · 33.9% income · $667 rent · Rep 581 3.4 33.9% $667 Rep
004 Hersey Pop 360 · 26.3% income · $950 rent · Rep 360 3.2 26.3% $950 Rep
005 Tustin Pop 203 · 34.2% income · $791 rent · Rep 203 2.8 34.2% $791 Rep
006 Le Roy Pop 202 · 28.9% income · $1,063 rent · Rep 202 2.6 28.9% $1,063 Rep

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Osceola County sits in Michigan's central Lower Peninsula with a tracked renter population of 5,530 spread across six cities. The county's eviction risk scores a 3.1/10 (Low), placing it 33rd of 83 Michigan eviction laws counties - meaning 32 counties carry higher risk and 50 are more landlord-favorable. That middle-third position reflects a rental market that is neither the state's most contentious nor its most passive: average rents run $766 per month, average rent burden sits at 29.5% of income, and the renter share of households is 38% - above the typical rural Michigan floor.

Reed City is the county seat and largest rental market, home to roughly 2,517 residents and a score of 2.9/10, which represents the quieter end of the county's range. Evart and Marion each score 3.4/10 - the county ceiling - driven by a poverty rate of 20.8% that concentrates financial stress on tenants and increases the likelihood of late-payment notices. Hersey comes in at 3.2/10, while Tustin (2.8/10) and Le Roy (2.6/10) are the most landlord-favorable communities in the county. The spread from 2.6 to 3.4 is relatively tight, which tells landlords there is no single high-pressure outlier pulling the average up; cost-of-process risk is fairly uniform across all six cities.

Michigan's landlord-tenant framework under MCL § 554.601 et seq. governs all Osceola County tenancies. Nonpayment of rent requires a 7-day notice (MCL 600.5714) before filing; material lease violations carry a 30-day cure notice (MCL 554.134). Court filing fees run $45 to $150, sheriff lockout fees add $50 to $150, and contested cases routinely cost $500 to $2,500 in attorney fees with a timeline stretching 45 to 120 days to resolution. Michigan is a state-preemption jurisdiction: local governments cannot enact rent control ordinances, and Osceola County has no local tenant-protection layer beyond state statute. Source-of-income protections are not required under Michigan law, so landlords retain screening latitude not available in higher-regulation states. The habitability standard under MCL § 554.139 requires fit and sanitary conditions; retaliatory conduct by landlords is barred under MCL § 600.5720.

Scores reflect an average across all tracked census-designated places and cities within Osceola County; individual city pages carry granular breakdowns of rent, burden, and regulatory inputs for Reed City, Evart, Marion, Hersey, Tustin, and Le Roy.

Historical eviction filings in Osceola County

From 2010 to 2018, eviction filings in Osceola County increased 17%. The peak was 181 filings in 2013.1

Annual filings 2010–2018 No filing data published after 2018
Annual eviction filings in Osceola County 2000-2018 (Eviction Lab)2010: 115 filings2011: 129 filings2012: 138 filings2013: 181 filings2014: 152 filings2015: 118 filings2016: 121 filings2017: 122 filings2018: 134 filings

Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.

How Osceola County compares

Osceola County's 3.1/10 score aligns closely with rural central-Michigan eviction laws peers including Clare County (3.1), Gladwin County (3.17), Cheboygan County (3.13), Iosco County (3.03), and Baraga County (3.01) - a tight cluster that reflects similar income, rent-burden, and regulatory environments across Michigan eviction laws's northern Lower Peninsula.

Peer counties in Michigan

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Clare County eviction risk
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 6.4K
Peer county
Cheboygan County eviction risk
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 7.4K
Peer county
Iosco County eviction risk
3
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 6.6K
Peer county
Gladwin County eviction risk
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 4.2K

Where eviction risk concentrates in Osceola County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Osceola County

Q1

What is the eviction risk score for Osceola County?

Osceola County has a county-wide landlord eviction risk score of 3.1/10 (Low), averaged across 6 cities. Scores range from 2.6 to 3.4 within the county.
Q2

What is the rent-to-income ratio in Osceola County?

Rent-to-income ratio in Osceola County averages 29.5% of household income on gross rent, per ACS 2023 5-year data.
Q3

How many cities are in Osceola County?

6 cities sit in Osceola County, MI, serving approximately 5,530 residents.