Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Lexington Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27003050901 · Anoka County, MN · pop 2,448 · 83% of tract blocks fall in Lexington

Census tract 27003050901 covers Lexington, home to 2,448 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than about 75% of US census tracts.

About 48% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,462 a month while the average household earns $72,955 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 24% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,102
Renter share47.0%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$72,955

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Lexington
Moderate
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#17 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
High
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#695 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
National
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lexington and the region

Centroid at 45.1406, -93.1727 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lexington scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lexington
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,462 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lexington
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lexington
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lexington
5.9

How Lexington compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lexington risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 050901Lexington: 5.05.0Lexingtonparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 68

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 122Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 10.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.0%Peak (2011)
  • 28Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030509012009: 22 filings (8.74/100 renter HHs)2010: 30 filings (11.19/100 renter HHs)2011: 42 filings (14.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 28 filings (9.33/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 27% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lexington

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lexington, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Anoka County average of 5.3 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 122 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 10.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 14.0% of renter households in 2011.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050901?

Census tract 27003050901 in Lexington scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050901?

Median gross rent is $1,462/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050901?

9.5% of residents in tract 27003050901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,448.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 17th, minority 36th, housing 81th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050901?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 122 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.82% of renter households, peaking at 14.0% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27003050901 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27003050901 compare to Lexington overall?

Tract 27003050901 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Lexington at 5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lexington; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related