Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Randolph Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27037061402 · Dakota County, MN · pop 3,781 · 12% of tract blocks fall in Randolph

Census tract 27037061402 sits in Randolph, Minnesota eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of $1/10. That is riskier than about 12% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 19% of renter households, a modest level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,330 a month while the average household earns $114,797 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 7% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 6% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,413
Renter share7.2%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$114,797

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Randolph
Moderate
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#72 of 106 tracts In Dakota County
Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#1,293 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very Low
National
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#79,124 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Randolph and the region

Centroid at 44.5716, -92.9238 · click any tract to drill in

Why Randolph scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Randolph
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,330 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Randolph
1.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Randolph
4.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Randolph
3.0

How Randolph compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Randolph risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 061402Randolph: 5.05.0Randolphparent cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 7

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 29Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 3.15%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.7%Peak (2009)
  • 6Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270370614022009: 8 filings (4.65/100 renter HHs)2010: 3 filings (2.29/100 renter HHs)2011: 4 filings (1.96/100 renter HHs)2012: 8 filings (3.92/100 renter HHs)2013: 6 filings (2.94/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Randolph

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 4.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Randolph, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Dakota County average of 5.3 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 29 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 3.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.7% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 7th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27037061402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061402?

Census tract 27037061402 in Randolph scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27037061402?

Median gross rent is $1,330/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 19% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061402?

3.3% of residents in tract 27037061402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,781.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 15th, minority 5th, housing 19th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061402?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 29 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061402 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.15% of renter households, peaking at 4.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27037061402 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27037061402 compare to Randolph overall?

Tract 27037061402 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Randolph at 5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Randolph; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related