Furnas County, Nebraska Eviction Risk: Low
7 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Cambridge (2.9) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #63 of 93 NE counties
3k residents · 7 cities · 1 tracts
Furnas County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord16.6%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Furnas County, NE, tenants prevail in roughly 16.6% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline29dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Furnas County, NE until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 29 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.1–3.1klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Furnas County, NE costs landlords $1,074 to $3,100 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$81131% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Furnas County, NE is $811 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 31% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters21.5%of households21.5% of occupied housing units in Furnas County, NE are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty12.9%4.8% unemp.12.9% of Furnas County, NE residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 4.8%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Furnas County scores 2.5/10 (Low), with city scores ranging from 2.3 to 2.9/10 across its seven communities. Ranked 63rd of 93 Nebraska counties - 62 counties carry higher eviction risk.
How Furnas County ranks in Nebraska
Landlord guides for Nebraska
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Cambridge | 1,082 | 2.3 | 27.0% | $771 | Rep |
| 002 | Arapahoe | 993 | 2.5 | 43.1% | $838 | Rep |
| 003 | Beaver City | 547 | 2.6 | 19.1% | $703 | Rep |
| 004 | Holbrook | 273 | 2.9 | 27.3% | $1,089 | Rep |
| 005 | Edison | 147 | 2.7 | 31.1% | $811 | Rep |
| 006 | Wilsonville | 98 | 2.4 | 31.1% | $811 | Rep |
| 007 | Hendley | 21 | 2.4 | 31.1% | $811 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Furnas County sits in the Republican River valley of south-central Nebraska, a sparsely populated agricultural county of about 3,161 residents spread across seven incorporated communities. For landlords operating here, the county's overall eviction risk score of 2.5/10 (Low) reflects the relatively landlord-friendly environment that Nebraska eviction laws's statewide statute creates - one without rent control, without just-cause eviction requirements, and with a clear, codified notice framework under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1401 et seq. Furnas ranks 63rd of 93 Nebraska eviction laws counties for eviction risk, placing it in the lower-risk of the state, meaning the overwhelming majority of Nebraska eviction laws counties present a more challenging environment for landlords than Furnas does.
Within the county, individual city scores span from 2.3 to 2.9/10, a spread that reflects differences in local renter demographics and poverty levels across these small communities. Cambridge, the county seat and largest city at 1,082 residents, carries a score of 2.3/10 - the lowest in the county and a product of its relatively stable local economy. Arapahoe (993 residents) comes in at 2.5/10, while Beaver City (547 residents) scores 2.6/10. At the higher end, Holbrook (273 residents) registers 2.9/10 - the highest risk reading in the county - driven by elevated poverty rates in that small community. Edison (147 residents) scores 2.7/10, and both Wilsonville and Hendley come in at 2.4/10 and 2.4/10 respectively. Even the county's highest-scoring community remains firmly within Low risk territory when measured against the statewide average of 2.9/10.
Renters make up just 21.5% of Furnas County households - far below the Nebraska eviction laws urban average - and average rent runs $811 per month. A rent burden rate of 31.1% and a poverty rate of 12.9% are meaningful context for landlords: a meaningful share of tenants in this county are cost-stressed, which can contribute to non-payment situations. Nebraska eviction laws's 7-day pay-or-quit notice for non-payment (under the same URLTA statute) gives landlords a relatively tight cure window, and uncontested eviction proceedings typically resolve in 21 to 45 days. Court filing fees in Nebraska eviction laws run $85 to $200, with sheriff lockout fees of $40 to $150. The combination of a small renter pool, moderate rent burden, and a streamlined state statute keeps the overall risk profile for Furnas County landlords among the more manageable in the Great Plains.
Furnas County's 2.5/10 score sits in the lower-risk of Nebraska's 93 counties. Nebraska eviction laws prohibits local rent control through state preemption, so no city within Furnas can impose caps, and there is no just-cause eviction requirement anywhere in the county. The 21.5% renter share means the rental market here is thin but stable - landlords tend to know their tenants, and turnover is relatively low.
Historical eviction filings in Furnas County
From 2000 to 2016, eviction filings in Furnas County increased 50%. The peak was 5 filings in 2015.1
- 22000
- 5Peak (2015)
- 32016
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Furnas County compares
Furnas County's 2.5/10 score (Low) sits slightly below the Nebraska eviction laws statewide average of 2.9/10, confirming a modestly more landlord-friendly environment than the typical Nebraska eviction laws county. Peer counties at similar risk levels include Sheridan, Antelope, Thayer, Polk, and Chase Counties - all clustered in the same low-risk band. None of those peers carry rent control or just-cause requirements, and all operate under the same URLTA framework. The practical differences between these counties come down to local renter share and poverty rates rather than legal structure.