Furnas County, Nebraska Eviction Risk: Low
7 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Cambridge (3.8) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #38 of 93 NE counties
3k residents · 7 cities · 1 tracts
Furnas County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord16.6%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Furnas County, NE, tenants prevail in roughly 16.6% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline29dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Furnas County, NE until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 29 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.1–3.1klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Furnas County, NE costs landlords $1,074 to $3,100 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$81131% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Furnas County, NE is $811 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 31% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters21.5%of households21.5% of occupied housing units in Furnas County, NE are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty12.9%4.8% unemp.12.9% of Furnas County, NE residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 4.8%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Furnas County scores 3.4/10 (Low), with city scores ranging from 3.1 to 3.8/10 across its seven communities. Ranked 38th of 93 Nebraska counties - 37 counties carry higher eviction risk.
How Furnas County ranks in Nebraska
Landlord guides for Nebraska
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Cambridge | 1,082 | 3.2 | 27.0% | $771 | Rep |
| 002 | Arapahoe | 993 | 3.8 | 43.1% | $838 | Rep |
| 003 | Beaver City | 547 | 3.2 | 19.1% | $703 | Rep |
| 004 | Holbrook | 273 | 3.2 | 27.3% | $1,089 | Rep |
| 005 | Edison | 147 | 3.2 | 31.1% | $811 | Rep |
| 006 | Wilsonville | 98 | 3.1 | 31.1% | $811 | Rep |
| 007 | Hendley | 21 | 3.1 | 31.1% | $811 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Furnas County sits in the Republican River valley of south-central Nebraska, a sparsely populated agricultural county of about 3,161 residents spread across seven incorporated communities. For landlords operating here, the county's overall eviction risk score of 3.4/10 (Low) reflects the relatively landlord-friendly environment that Nebraska eviction laws's statewide statute creates - one without rent control, without just-cause eviction requirements, and with a clear, codified notice framework under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1401 et seq. Furnas ranks 38th of 93 Nebraska eviction laws counties for eviction risk, placing it in the middle of the state, meaning the overwhelming majority of Nebraska eviction laws counties present a more challenging environment for landlords than Furnas does.
Within the county, individual city scores span from 3.1 to 3.8/10, a spread that reflects differences in local renter demographics and poverty levels across these small communities. Cambridge, the county seat and largest city at 1,082 residents, carries a score of 3.2/10 - the lowest in the county and a product of its relatively stable local economy. Arapahoe (993 residents) comes in at 3.8/10, while Beaver City (547 residents) scores 3.2/10. At the higher end, Holbrook (273 residents) registers 3.2/10 - the highest risk reading in the county - driven by elevated poverty rates in that small community. Edison (147 residents) scores 3.2/10, and both Wilsonville and Hendley come in at 3.1/10 and 3.1/10 respectively. Even the county's highest-scoring community remains firmly within Low risk territory when measured against the statewide average of 3.6/10.
Renters make up just 21.5% of Furnas County households - far below the Nebraska eviction laws urban average - and average rent runs $811 per month. A rent burden rate of 31.1% and a poverty rate of 12.9% are meaningful context for landlords: a meaningful share of tenants in this county are cost-stressed, which can contribute to non-payment situations. Nebraska eviction laws's 7-day pay-or-quit notice for non-payment (under the same URLTA statute) gives landlords a relatively tight cure window, and uncontested eviction proceedings typically resolve in 21 to 45 days. Court filing fees in Nebraska eviction laws run $85 to $200, with sheriff lockout fees of $40 to $150. The combination of a small renter pool, moderate rent burden, and a streamlined state statute keeps the overall risk profile for Furnas County landlords among the more manageable in the Great Plains.
Furnas County's 3.4/10 score sits in the middle of Nebraska's 93 counties. Nebraska eviction laws prohibits local rent control through state preemption, so no city within Furnas can impose caps, and there is no just-cause eviction requirement anywhere in the county. The 21.5% renter share means the rental market here is thin but stable - landlords tend to know their tenants, and turnover is relatively low.
Historical eviction filings in Furnas County
From 2000 to 2016, eviction filings in Furnas County increased 50%. The peak was 5 filings in 2015.1
- 22000
- 5Peak (2015)
- 32016
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Furnas County compares
Furnas County's 3.4/10 score (Low) sits slightly below the Nebraska eviction laws statewide average of 3.6/10, confirming a modestly more landlord-friendly environment than the typical Nebraska eviction laws county. Peer counties at similar risk levels include Sheridan, Antelope, Thayer, Polk, and Chase Counties - all clustered in the same low-risk band. None of those peers carry rent control or just-cause requirements, and all operate under the same URLTA framework. The practical differences between these counties come down to local renter share and poverty rates rather than legal structure.