Kearney County, Nebraska Eviction Risk: Very Low
5 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Minden (2.5) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #78 of 93 NE counties
4k residents · 5 cities · 2 tracts
Kearney County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord17.4%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Kearney County, NE, tenants prevail in roughly 17.4% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline28dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Kearney County, NE until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 28 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.0–3.2klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Kearney County, NE costs landlords $975 to $3,189 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$86723% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Kearney County, NE is $867 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 23% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters22.6%of households22.6% of occupied housing units in Kearney County, NE are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty6.7%1.7% unemp.6.7% of Kearney County, NE residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 1.7%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Kearney County's composite score of 2.4/10 (Very Low) spans a narrow band from 2.2 to 2.5 across its five cities, indicating a consistent low-risk environment countywide. Ranked 78th of 93 Nebraska counties -- 77 counties carry higher risk, 15 rank lower.
How Kearney County ranks in Nebraska
Landlord guides for Nebraska
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Minden | 3,108 | 2.4 | 23.3% | $823 | Rep |
| 002 | Axtell | 818 | 2.5 | 25.0% | $1,115 | Rep |
| 003 | Wilcox | 336 | 2.4 | 16.6% | $678 | Rep |
| 004 | Heartwell | 97 | 2.2 | 15.0% | $825 | Rep |
| 005 | Norman | 36 | 2.3 | 22.9% | $867 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Kearney County sits in south-central Nebraska, a thinly populated agricultural county of roughly 4,395 residents spread across five small communities. Its composite eviction-risk score is 2.4/10 (Very Low), placing it at 78th of 93 Nebraska counties -- meaning 77 counties carry a higher risk profile and only 15 sit below it. That puts Kearney County firmly in the lower-risk tier of the state, a reflection of a local rental market shaped more by grain prices and farm-sector stability than by the tenant-protection ordinances or chronic rent-burden pressures that push urban Nebraska counties higher on the scale. The Nebraska state average is 2.9/10; Kearney County lands notably below that benchmark.
The county seat and largest community, Minden (population 3,108), anchors the local rental economy with a city-level score of 2.4/10. Rents in Minden eviction risk tend to cluster around the county average of $867 per month, a figure that keeps the rent-burden rate at 22.9% of renter household income -- well below the 30% threshold that HUD uses to define cost-burdened households. That underlying affordability is one reason eviction pressure stays muted here. The town of Axtell (pop. 818) edges slightly higher at 2.5/10, the top of the county's spread, while Wilcox (pop. 336) ties Minden at 2.4/10. Smaller communities post the lowest readings: Heartwell scores 2.2/10 and Norman comes in at 2.3/10. Across all five cities the spread runs from 2.2 to 2.5 -- a notably narrow band that reflects Kearney County's uniform socioeconomic character rather than the patchwork of risk you find in counties with both dense urban cores and distressed rural fringes.
Nebraska's governing statute is the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1401 et seq.), and Kearney County operates entirely within its framework. There is no local rent control, and the state's preemption statute bars municipalities from enacting it. Non-payment of rent triggers a 7-day pay-or-quit notice, lease violations carry a 14-day cure window, and no-cause terminations require 30 days of written notice. An uncontested eviction typically clears the courts in 21 to 45 days; a contested case can stretch to 100 days. Court filing fees run $85 to $200, sheriff lockout fees $40 to $150, and attorney costs commonly fall in the $500 to $2,500 range depending on complexity. With a poverty rate of just 6.7% and only 22.6% of households renting, the pool of at-risk tenants is small, and filings remain proportionally infrequent. For landlords, that combination -- low burden, clear statutory framework, no rent control, and a tight but stable rental base -- translates directly into the Very Low risk reading the model assigns this county.
Kearney County's 22.9% rent-burden rate and 6.7% poverty rate are among the lower readings in south-central Nebraska eviction laws, keeping eviction filings uncommon relative to peer markets. The county's score of 2.4/10 sits in the lower-risk of the state's 93 counties, and the narrow range from 2.2 to 2.5 across its five cities signals a consistently stable rental environment rather than localized pockets of distress.
Historical eviction filings in Kearney County
From 2000 to 2016, eviction filings in Kearney County increased 100%. The peak was 16 filings in 2007.1
- 42000
- 16Peak (2007)
- 82016
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Kearney County compares
Kearney County's score of 2.4/10 is below the Nebraska state average of 2.9/10 and comparable to nearby low-risk peers. Fillmore County and Cedar County carry very similar profiles, while Clay County and Nuckolls County are marginally higher but still within the same low-risk band. Merrick County sits slightly above the group. None of these peers have meaningfully different statutory environments -- the variation reflects differences in rent burden, poverty rates, and renter-share rather than any regulatory divergence, since all operate under the same state URLTA framework with no local rent control allowed.