Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally
Gretna Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 31153010632 · Sarpy County, NE · pop 7,037 · 25% of tract blocks fall in Gretna
For landlords sizing up Gretna, census tract 31153010632 carries a lower eviction-risk score of 3.9/10. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 29% of renter households, a moderate level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,373 monthly, set against $140,402 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 21% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,340
Renter share21.4%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$140,402
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
4
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
0
th percentile
Very Low
National
2
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Gretna and the region
Centroid at 41.1541, -96.2203 · click any tract to drill in
Why Gretna scores 1.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Gretna
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,373 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gretna
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gretna
5.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gretna
3.3
How Gretna compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 1%Socioeconomic
- 30%Household composition
- 9%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 84Total filings over 11 yrs
- 2.79%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.0%Peak (2008)
- 13Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 550% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.7%Food insecurity
- 4.3%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 5.6%No health insurance
- 13.0%Frequent mental distress
- 19.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Gretna
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 5.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Gretna eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Sarpy County average of 4.1 and in line with the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 84 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 2.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.0% of renter households in 2008.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 31153010632
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31153010632?
Census tract 31153010632 in Gretna scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31153010632?
Median gross rent is $1,373/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31153010632?
2.6% of residents in tract 31153010632 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,037.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31153010632?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 30th, minority 9th, housing 48th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31153010632?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 84 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 31153010632 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.79% of renter households, peaking at 8.0% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 31153010632 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 31153010632 compare to Gretna overall?
Tract 31153010632 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Gretna at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gretna eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Gretna
Top eight tracts in Gretna ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related