Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally
Audubon Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34007605602 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,050
Here is how census tract 34007605602, in Audubon, looks to a landlord: a 6.2/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,050. On the national scale it ranks #16,718 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 44% of renter households, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,343 monthly, set against $131,250 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,039
Renter share23.3%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$131,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
2
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
7
th percentile
Very Low
National
4
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Audubon and the region
Centroid at 39.8866, -75.0722 · click any tract to drill in
Why Audubon scores 1.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Audubon
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,343 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Audubon
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Audubon
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Audubon
3.1
How Audubon compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 34%Household composition
- 11%Racial/ethnic minority
- 27%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 12%Grade B
- 81%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 220Total filings over 6 yrs
- 14.52%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.7%Peak (2017)
- 38Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.4%Food insecurity
- 5.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 7.3%No health insurance
- 16.0%Frequent mental distress
- 23.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Audubon
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Audubon, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Camden County average of 6.8 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007605602
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007605602?
Census tract 34007605602 in Audubon scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007605602?
Median gross rent is $1,343/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007605602?
2.5% of residents in tract 34007605602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,050.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007605602?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 34th, minority 11th, housing 27th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007605602?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 220 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007605602 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.52% of renter households, peaking at 17.7% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34007605602 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34007605602 compare to Audubon overall?
Tract 34007605602 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Audubon at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Audubon; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34007605602 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Audubon
Top eight tracts in Audubon ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related