Stockton Eviction Risk: High , Camden
Tract 34007602601 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,014 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Eviction risk in the Stockton area of Camden centers on tract 34007602601, which scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,014 residents. That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 44% of renter households, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,244 monthly, set against $76,419 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 18% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9349, -75.0643 · click any tract to drill in
Why Stockton scores 8.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Stockton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 67
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 64%Socioeconomic
- 88%Household composition
- 81%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 22%Grade A
- 20%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 7%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.
Historic baseline (2000-2018)
- 47Total filings over 6 yrs
- 7.59%Avg annual filing rate
- 12.9%Peak (2018)
- 15Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Stockton. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.0%Housing insecurity
- 8.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 19.9%Food insecurity
- 11.8%SNAP enrollment
- 9.3%Transit barriers
- 14.9%No health insurance
- 15.6%Frequent mental distress
- 30.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Stockton
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camden eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Camden County average of 6.8 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Part of this tract, about 7% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was A ("Best"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
In CDC survey modeling, about 16.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34007602601
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007602601?
Census tract 34007602601 in the Stockton neighborhood scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
What is the average rent in tract 34007602601?
Median gross rent is $1,244/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007602601?
10.2% of residents in tract 34007602601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,014.
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007602601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 88th, minority 81th, housing 30th.
Is tract 34007602601 considered part of Stockton?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007602601 fall within Stockton (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007602601?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 47 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007602601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.59% of renter households, peaking at 12.9% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
What share of households in tract 34007602601 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
How does tract 34007602601 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007602601 scores 8.9/10, higher than the parent city of Camden at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Was tract 34007602601 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 7% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.