White Horse Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34021002602 · Mercer County, NJ · pop 4,688 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Eviction risk in the White Horse area of White Horse centers on tract 34021002602, which scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 4,688 residents. It lands near the 85th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 41% of renter households, a severe level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,677 monthly, set against $90,850 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across White Horse and the region
Centroid at 40.1971, -74.7150 · click any tract to drill in
Why White Horse scores 2.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow White Horse compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 56
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 46%Socioeconomic
- 64%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 20%Grade B
- 25%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 407Total filings over 6 yrs
- 10.30%Avg annual filing rate
- 12.7%Peak (2014)
- 66Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within White Horse. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.8%Housing insecurity
- 9.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.7%Food insecurity
- 11.1%SNAP enrollment
- 9.2%Transit barriers
- 15.2%No health insurance
- 16.5%Frequent mental distress
- 25.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in White Horse
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from White Horse, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Mercer County average of 6.7 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 16.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34021002602
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34021002602?
What is the average rent in tract 34021002602?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34021002602?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34021002602?
Is tract 34021002602 considered part of White Horse?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34021002602?
What share of households in tract 34021002602 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34021002602 compare to White Horse overall?
Was tract 34021002602 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in White Horse
Top eight tracts in White Horse ranked by composite eviction-risk score.