Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
Etna Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39089757401 · Licking County, OH · pop 5,020 · 37% of tract blocks fall in Etna
Census tract 39089757401 belongs to Etna, Ohio. It is home to 5,020 residents and scores 4.8/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 31st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 43% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,387 a month against an average household income of $107,031 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,649
Renter share16.3%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$107,031
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
49
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
31
th percentile
Low
National
25
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Etna and the region
Centroid at 39.9534, -82.7009 · click any tract to drill in
Why Etna scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Etna
4.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,387 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Etna
2.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Etna
4.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Etna
5.0
How Etna compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 14%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 36%Racial/ethnic minority
- 18%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.6%Food insecurity
- 7.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 16.7%Frequent mental distress
- 25.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Etna
What moves this score most is housing court bias at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Etna, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Licking County average of 4.8 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39089757401
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39089757401?
Census tract 39089757401 in Etna scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39089757401?
Median gross rent is $1,387/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39089757401?
10.3% of residents in tract 39089757401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,020.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39089757401?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 13th, minority 36th, housing 18th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 39089757401 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 39089757401 compare to Etna overall?
Tract 39089757401 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Etna at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Etna; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related