Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Tri-Hill Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 42133010520 ·
York County, PA · pop 2,667 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
The Elevated-tier score of $1/10 for census tract 42133010520 reflects conditions in Tri-Hill in York, Pennsylvania. That is riskier than about 74% of US census tracts.
About 78% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,438 a month against an average household income of $102,207 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%Stable renters 3%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units921
Renter share14.2%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate14.9%
Median income$102,207
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Tri-Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In city
Very High
Within county
65th percentile
#38 of 108 tracts In York County
Elevated
Within state
44th percentile
#1,935 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across York County and the region
Centroid at 39.9430, -76.7080 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tri-Hill scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
14.9% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,438 rent vs county FMR
5.7
Rent control risk
State baseline
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tri-Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
44%Socioeconomic
89%Household composition
38%Racial/ethnic minority
30%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
19Total filings over 6 yrs
5.42%Avg annual filing rate
6.4%Peak (2005)
4Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2006
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tri-Hill
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 5.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Pennsylvania eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the York County average of 5.6 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 19 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 5.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.4% of renter households in 2005.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 42133010520
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42133010520?
Census tract 42133010520 in the Tri-Hill neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42133010520?
Median gross rent is $1,438/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 78% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42133010520?
14.9% of residents in tract 42133010520 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,667.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42133010520?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 89th, minority 38th, housing 30th.
Q5
Is tract 42133010520 considered part of Tri-Hill?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42133010520 fall within Tri-Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42133010520?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 19 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 42133010520 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.42% of renter households, peaking at 6.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Was tract 42133010520 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.