Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,404 of 84,120 nationally

Knightsville Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cranston

Tract 44007014000 · Providence County, RI · pop 6,958 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 44007014000 sits in the Knightsville neighborhood of Cranston, Rhode Island. It has a population of 6,958 and an eviction-risk score of 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). 58% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 35% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,447/month against a median household income of $79,096 — roughly 22% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 12% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units2,504
Renter share28.0%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate8.5%
Median income$79,096

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank — 50th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 1 tracts In Knightsville
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank — 75th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 17 tracts In Cranston
High
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank — 44th percentileBottomTop
#81 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Moderate
Within state
50 th percentile
Rank — 50th percentileBottomTop
#125 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cranston and the region

Centroid at 41.7843, -71.4458 · click any tract to drill in

Why Knightsville scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cranston
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
8.5% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,447 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cranston
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cranston
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cranston
5.5

How Knightsville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Knightsville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 014000Cranston: 5.35.3Cranstonparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 42Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 3.98%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.2%Peak (2016)
  • 25Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 110Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.98×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (12.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (12.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007014000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007014000?

Census tract 44007014000 in the Knightsville neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007014000?

Median gross rent is $1,447/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007014000?

8.5% of residents in tract 44007014000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,958.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007014000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 37th, minority 57th, housing 67th.

Q5

Is tract 44007014000 considered part of Knightsville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007014000 fall within Knightsville (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007014000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 42 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007014000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.98% of renter households, peaking at 5.2% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007014000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.98× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.

Q8

What share of households in tract 44007014000 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q9

How does tract 44007014000 compare to Cranston overall?

Tract 44007014000 scores 5.9/10 — higher than the parent city of Cranston at 5.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cranston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q10

Was tract 44007014000 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cranston

Top eight tracts in Cranston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related