Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally
Pocasset Eviction Risk: Lower , Cranston
Tract 44007013800 · Providence County, RI · pop 5,044 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 44007013800 sits in the Pocasset area of Cranston eviction risk, Rhode Island eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of $1/10. It lands near the 74th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 53% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,553 monthly, set against $83,466 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units2,230
Renter share26.4%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$83,466
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
69
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
25
th percentile
Low
Within state
43
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cranston and the region
Centroid at 41.7664, -71.4387 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pocasset scores 2.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cranston
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,553 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cranston
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cranston
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cranston
5.5
How Pocasset compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 15%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 14%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 49Total filings over 2 yrs
- 5.07%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.1%Peak (2016)
- 29Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 214Total filings 2020-21
- 2.8Avg monthly (observed)
- 3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.87×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.3%Housing insecurity
- 7.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.2%Food insecurity
- 11.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.1%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 17.0%Frequent mental distress
- 26.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pocasset
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cranston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Providence County average of 6.1 and in line with the Rhode Island statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 49 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 5.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.1% of renter households in 2016.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 44007013800
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007013800?
Census tract 44007013800 in the Pocasset neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 44007013800?
Median gross rent is $1,553/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 44007013800?
9.8% of residents in tract 44007013800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,044.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 44007013800?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 38th, minority 43th, housing 38th.
Q5
Is tract 44007013800 considered part of Pocasset?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007013800 fall within Pocasset (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007013800?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 49 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007013800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.07% of renter households, peaking at 6.1% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 44007013800 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.87× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 44007013800 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 44007013800 compare to Cranston overall?
Tract 44007013800 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of Cranston at 5.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cranston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10
Was tract 44007013800 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cranston
Top eight tracts in Cranston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related