Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally
Pisgah Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 01071951000 · Jackson County, AL · pop 4,199 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Pisgah
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 01071951000 (Pisgah, Alabama) comes in at $1/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than about 2% of US census tracts.
20% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $728 a month against an average household income of $52,433 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,731
Renter share18.5%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$52,433
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
20
th percentile
Low
Within state
53
th percentile
Moderate
National
57
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pisgah and the region
Centroid at 34.7012, -85.8146 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pisgah scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pisgah
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
1.6
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$728 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pisgah
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pisgah
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pisgah
5.4
How Pisgah compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 56%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 17%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 72Total filings over 15 yrs
- 1.50%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.4%Peak (2013)
- 3Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 16 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.9%Housing insecurity
- 8.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.8%Food insecurity
- 13.2%SNAP enrollment
- 9.3%Transit barriers
- 9.8%No health insurance
- 18.5%Frequent mental distress
- 42.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pisgah
What moves this score most is housing court bias at 5.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pisgah, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jackson County average of 4.1 and below the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 45th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 11.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 01071951000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01071951000?
Census tract 01071951000 in Pisgah scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01071951000?
Median gross rent is $728/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01071951000?
11.5% of residents in tract 01071951000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,199.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01071951000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 50th, minority 17th, housing 38th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01071951000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 72 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 01071951000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.50% of renter households, peaking at 3.4% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 01071951000 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 01071951000 compare to Pisgah overall?
Tract 01071951000 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Pisgah at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pisgah; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related