Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally

Grayson Valley Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 01073011112 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,911 · 35% of tract blocks fall in Grayson Valley

In Grayson Valley, census tract 01073011112 scores 6.4/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,439 a month against an average household income of $54,821 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 6% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,633
Renter share15.8%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate36.7%
Median income$54,821

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Grayson Valley
Moderate
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#53 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Elevated
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#239 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
High
National
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#18,240 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Grayson Valley and the region

Centroid at 33.6382, -86.6528 · click any tract to drill in

Why Grayson Valley scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Grayson Valley
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
36.7% poverty · this tract
9.2
Supply constraint
$1,439 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grayson Valley
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grayson Valley
6.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grayson Valley
6.4

How Grayson Valley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Grayson Valley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 011112Grayson Valley: 2.52.5Grayson Valleyparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Grayson Valley

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 9.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Grayson Valley, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073011112

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073011112?

Census tract 01073011112 in Grayson Valley scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073011112?

Median gross rent is $1,439/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073011112?

36.7% of residents in tract 01073011112 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,911.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073011112?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 81th, minority 81th, housing 8th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 01073011112 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 01073011112 compare to Grayson Valley overall?

Tract 01073011112 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of Grayson Valley at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grayson Valley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related