Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally
Satsuma Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 01097005601 · Mobile County, AL · pop 2,883 · 78% of tract blocks fall in Satsuma
Satsuma anchors census tract 01097005601, which lands at 4.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
84% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $103,235 a year. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units950
Renter share5.9%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$103,235
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
1
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
6
th percentile
Very Low
National
12
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Satsuma and the region
Centroid at 30.8634, -88.0412 · click any tract to drill in
Why Satsuma scores 2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Satsuma
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Satsuma
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Satsuma
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Satsuma
2.3
How Satsuma compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 54%Household composition
- 29%Racial/ethnic minority
- 0%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.9%Food insecurity
- 5.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 29.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Satsuma
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Satsuma, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Mobile County average of 4.9 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 01097005601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097005601?
Census tract 01097005601 in Satsuma scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 01097005601?
4.1% of residents in tract 01097005601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,883.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 01097005601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 54th, minority 29th, housing 0th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 01097005601 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 01097005601 compare to Satsuma overall?
Tract 01097005601 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Satsuma at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Satsuma; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Satsuma
Top eight tracts in Satsuma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related