Landmark Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 05119004004 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 3,934 · 51% of tract blocks fall in Landmark
Here is how census tract 05119004004, in Landmark, looks to a landlord: a 6.2/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,934. It lands near the 82nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
59% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $547 a month against an average household income of $60,566 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Landmark and the region
Centroid at 34.5957, -92.3092 · click any tract to drill in
Why Landmark scores 5.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Landmark compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 60%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 33%Racial/ethnic minority
- 47%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.1%Housing insecurity
- 13.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.5%Food insecurity
- 17.0%SNAP enrollment
- 12.3%Transit barriers
- 13.9%No health insurance
- 19.4%Frequent mental distress
- 44.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Landmark
The heaviest input here is housing court bias at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Landmark, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 17.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 53rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 05119004004
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119004004?
What is the average rent in tract 05119004004?
What is the poverty rate in tract 05119004004?
How socially vulnerable is tract 05119004004?
What share of households in tract 05119004004 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 05119004004 compare to Landmark overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Landmark
Top eight tracts in Landmark ranked by composite eviction-risk score.