Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally

Van Ness Eviction Risk: Elevated , Los Angeles

Tract 06037600801 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,761 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 06037600801 sits in the Van Ness area of Inglewood, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.6/10. It is home to 2,761 residents. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10.

Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 13% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,213
Renter share27.4%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate8.0%
Median income$110,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Van Ness
Very Low
Within parent city
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 26 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#1,797 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#4,223 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.9655, -118.3221 · click any tract to drill in

Why Van Ness scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.0% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$2,157 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5

How Van Ness compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Van Ness risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.67.6This tracttract 600801Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Van Ness. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Van Ness

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10. Severe burden reaches 17%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Running cool, economic stress reads 2/10. At $2,157 a month, rents run 21% over what the rest of Inglewood commands.

It sits 0.8 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. 54% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $110,625.

27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037600801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037600801?

Census tract 06037600801 in the Van Ness neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037600801?

Median gross rent is $2,157/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037600801?

8.0% of residents in tract 06037600801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,761.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037600801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 45th, minority 98th, housing 53th.
Q5

Is tract 06037600801 considered part of Van Ness?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037600801 fall within Van Ness (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037600801 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037600801 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037600801 scores 7.6/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037600801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related