Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #19,562 of 84,120 nationally

Edna Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06079012302 · San Luis Obispo, CA · pop 6,276 · 0% of tract blocks fall in Edna

Tract 06079012302 covers Edna in California. Home to 6,276 residents, it scores 4.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #64,034 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 39% of renter households, a high level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,127 a month against an average household income of $107,431 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 15% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,106
Renter share25.4%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$107,431

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Edna
Moderate
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#26 of 69 tracts In San Luis Obispo
Elevated
Within state
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#4,867 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#19,562 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Edna and the region

Centroid at 35.1210, -120.3379 · click any tract to drill in

Why Edna scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Edna
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$2,127 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Edna
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Edna
1.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Edna
4.0

How Edna compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Edna risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 012302Edna: 7.37.3Ednaparent cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Edna

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Edna, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the San Luis Obispo County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06079012302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06079012302?

Census tract 06079012302 in Edna scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06079012302?

Median gross rent is $2,127/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06079012302?

9.8% of residents in tract 06079012302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,276.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06079012302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 46th, minority 42th, housing 19th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06079012302 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06079012302 compare to Edna overall?

Tract 06079012302 scores 5.4/10, lower than the parent city of Edna at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Edna; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related