Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally
Channing Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Fish Hawk
Tract 12057013922 ·
Hillsborough, FL · pop 8,621 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
For landlords sizing up the Channing Park area of Fish Hawk, census tract 12057013922 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 21% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
24% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,252 a month against an average household income of $121,895 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 9%Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units2,537
Renter share12.4%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$121,895
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Channing Park
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#2 of 3 tracts In Fish Hawk
Moderate
Within county
5th percentile
#315 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very Low
Within state
5th percentile
#4,887 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fish Hawk and the region
Centroid at 27.8493, -82.2151 · click any tract to drill in
Why Channing Park scores 1.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fish Hawk
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,252 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fish Hawk
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fish Hawk
3.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fish Hawk
5.3
How Channing Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
17%Socioeconomic
31%Household composition
54%Racial/ethnic minority
4%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
40Total filings over 7 yrs
8.76%Avg annual filing rate
34.3%Peak (2005)
8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2016
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
39Total filings 2020-21
0.5Avg monthly (observed)
0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
0.84×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Channing Park
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fish Hawk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.84x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 9th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057013922
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057013922?
Census tract 12057013922 in the Channing Park neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057013922?
Median gross rent is $2,252/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057013922?
5.1% of residents in tract 12057013922 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,621.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057013922?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 31th, minority 54th, housing 4th.
Q5
Is tract 12057013922 considered part of Channing Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057013922 fall within Channing Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057013922?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 40 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 12057013922 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.76% of renter households, peaking at 34.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12057013922 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.84× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12057013922 compare to Fish Hawk overall?
Tract 12057013922 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Fish Hawk at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fish Hawk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fish Hawk
Top eight tracts in Fish Hawk ranked by composite eviction-risk score.