Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally
Tamarack Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 13067030235 ·
Cobb County, GA · pop 4,829 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
For landlords sizing up the Tamarack Lakes neighborhood of Cobb, census tract 13067030235 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.9/10. That is riskier than roughly 72% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
86% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,569 monthly, set against $130,063 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 1%Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,559
Renter share4.4%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate12.1%
Median income$130,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Tamarack Lakes
Very Low
Within county
50th percentile
#94 of 186 tracts In Cobb County
Moderate
Within state
17th percentile
#2,326 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
National
14th percentile
#72,539 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cobb County and the region
Centroid at 33.9284, -84.6794 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tamarack Lakes scores 2.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
12.1% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$2,569 rent vs county FMR
9.0
Rent control risk
State baseline
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tamarack Lakes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
32%Socioeconomic
48%Household composition
51%Racial/ethnic minority
4%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
10Total filings over 1 yrs
21.28%Avg annual filing rate
21.3%Peak (2016)
10Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
51Total filings 2020-21
0.7Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Tamarack Lakes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.0%Housing insecurity
6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
9.9%Food insecurity
7.2%SNAP enrollment
6.1%Transit barriers
8.1%No health insurance
14.5%Frequent mental distress
23.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tamarack Lakes
What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Georgia eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Cobb County average of 5.5 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 18th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 10 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 21.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 21.3% of renter households in 2016.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13067030235
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13067030235?
Census tract 13067030235 in the Tamarack Lakes neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13067030235?
Median gross rent is $2,569/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 86% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13067030235?
12.1% of residents in tract 13067030235 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,829.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13067030235?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 48th, minority 51th, housing 4th.
Q5
Is tract 13067030235 considered part of Tamarack Lakes?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13067030235 fall within Tamarack Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13067030235?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 10 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 13067030235 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 21.28% of renter households, peaking at 21.3% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13067030235 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.