Census Tract · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Nampa Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 16027020910 · Canyon County, ID · pop 2,148 · 44% of tract blocks fall in Nampa

How risky is Nampa for landlords? Census tract 16027020910 scores 2.6/10, the Lower tier. That ranks it among the lowest-risk tracts in the country for landlords, near the bottom 1% nationally.

9% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $114,332 a year. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.

Risk score

1.7

Lower

Confidence 70% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 7% Owners 92%

Tract context

Occupied units881

Renter share7.6%

SVI overall0.05

Poverty rate1.0%

Median income$114,332

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Nampa and the region

Centroid at 43.5434, -116.6179 · click any tract to drill in

Why Nampa scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Nampa

3.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

3.0

State political climate

Idaho legislature & governorship

1.5

Economic stress

1.0% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

tract rent vs county FMR

5.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Nampa

1.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Nampa

2.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Nampa

2.0

How Nampa compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 5

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

20%Socioeconomic
48%Household composition
21%Racial/ethnic minority
0%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

6.6%Housing insecurity
4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
7.9%Food insecurity
5.1%SNAP enrollment
5.0%Transit barriers
7.1%No health insurance
13.0%Frequent mental distress
32.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Nampa

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Nampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Canyon County average of 3.8 and below the Idaho statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 5th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 16027020910

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 16027020910?

Census tract 16027020910 in Nampa scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the poverty rate in tract 16027020910?

1.0% of residents in tract 16027020910 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,148.

How socially vulnerable is tract 16027020910?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 48th, minority 21th, housing 0th.

What share of households in tract 16027020910 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 16027020910 compare to Nampa overall?

Tract 16027020910 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Nampa at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Nampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Nampa

Top eight tracts in Nampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.