Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Fort Mitchell Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 21117064700 · Kenton County, KY · pop 5,652 · 76% of tract blocks fall in Fort Mitchell

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 21117064700 (Fort Mitchell in Kenton County, Kentucky) comes in at $1/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 39% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

30% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $937 a month against an average household income of $122,245 a year, roughly 9% of income at the averages. Renters make up 25% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 18% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,126
Renter share25.2%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate10.8%
Median income$122,245

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Fort Mitchell
Moderate
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#33 of 44 tracts In Kenton County
Low
Within state
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#1,199 of 1,306 tracts In Kentucky
Very Low
National
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#71,178 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Mitchell and the region

Centroid at 39.0423, -84.5523 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fort Mitchell scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Mitchell
4.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Kentucky legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
10.8% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$937 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Mitchell
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Mitchell
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Mitchell
4.8

How Fort Mitchell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fort Mitchell risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 064700Fort Mitchell: 2.22.2Fort Mitchellparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fort Mitchell

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Mitchell eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Kenton County average of 5.0 and in line with the Kentucky statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 21117064700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 21117064700?

Census tract 21117064700 in Fort Mitchell scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 21117064700?

Median gross rent is $937/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 21117064700?

10.8% of residents in tract 21117064700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,652.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 21117064700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 47th, minority 6th, housing 22th.
Q5

How does tract 21117064700 compare to Fort Mitchell overall?

Tract 21117064700 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Fort Mitchell at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Mitchell eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6

Was tract 21117064700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related