Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally

Happy Hollow Eviction Risk: Lower , Attleboro

Tract 25005631102 · Bristol County, MA · pop 4,741 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Happy Hollow in Attleboro is where census tract 25005631102 sits, home to 4,741 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.9/10. That is riskier than roughly 72% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,453 a month against an average household income of $90,781 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 9% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,704
Renter share13.8%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$90,781

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Happy Hollow
Moderate
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Attleboro
Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#88 of 130 tracts In Bristol County
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#977 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Attleboro and the region

Centroid at 41.9142, -71.3673 · click any tract to drill in

Why Happy Hollow scores 2.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Attleboro
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,453 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Attleboro
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Attleboro
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Attleboro
5.6

How Happy Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Happy Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.62.6This tracttract 631102Attleboro: 5.85.8Attleboroparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Happy Hollow

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Attleboro eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Bristol County average of 6.2 and in line with the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 25005631102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25005631102?

Census tract 25005631102 in the Happy Hollow neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25005631102?

Median gross rent is $1,453/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25005631102?

5.6% of residents in tract 25005631102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,741.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25005631102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 60th, minority 24th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 25005631102 considered part of Happy Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25005631102 fall within Happy Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 25005631102 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 25005631102 compare to Attleboro overall?

Tract 25005631102 scores 2.6/10, lower than the parent city of Attleboro at 5.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Attleboro eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 25005631102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Attleboro

Top eight tracts in Attleboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related