Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Grand Blanc Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 26049011209 · Genesee County, MI · pop 6,499 · 93% of tract blocks fall in Grand Blanc

Census tract 26049011209 sits in Grand Blanc, Michigan eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. It lands near the 50th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

29% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $839 a month against an average household income of $97,898 a year, roughly 10% of income at the averages. Renters make up 36% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 26% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units2,643
Renter share36.1%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$97,898

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Grand Blanc
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#130 of 134 tracts In Genesee County
Very Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#2,563 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Very Low
National
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#73,892 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Grand Blanc and the region

Centroid at 42.9310, -83.6085 · click any tract to drill in

Why Grand Blanc scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Grand Blanc
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$839 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grand Blanc
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grand Blanc
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grand Blanc
3.8

How Grand Blanc compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Grand Blanc risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.02.0This tracttract 011209Grand Blanc: 2.82.8Grand Blancparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Grand Blanc

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Grand Blanc, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Genesee County average of 6.0 and below the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 48th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 26049011209

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26049011209?

Census tract 26049011209 in Grand Blanc scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26049011209?

Median gross rent is $839/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26049011209?

5.4% of residents in tract 26049011209 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,499.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26049011209?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 52th, minority 39th, housing 70th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26049011209 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26049011209 compare to Grand Blanc overall?

Tract 26049011209 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Grand Blanc at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grand Blanc; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 26049011209 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Grand Blanc

Top eight tracts in Grand Blanc ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related