Tract 26081011401 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 26081011401 · Kent County, MI · pop 2,046
For landlords sizing up Kent, census tract 26081011401 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.5/10. On the national scale it ranks #64,823 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 14% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,083 a month while the average household earns $81,500 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Kent County and the region
Centroid at 43.0894, -85.7292 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 26081011401 scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 26081011401 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 25%Socioeconomic
- 26%Household composition
- 23%Racial/ethnic minority
- 39%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.0%Housing insecurity
- 6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.7%Food insecurity
- 11.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.0%Transit barriers
- 7.1%No health insurance
- 16.8%Frequent mental distress
- 30.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 26081011401
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Michigan eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Kent County average of 5.7 and below the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.