Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Haworth Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34003009200 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,342
With a score of 5.5/10, tract 34003009200 in Haworth ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,342 residents. On the national scale it ranks #36,487 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 29% of renter households, a moderate level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $227,841 a year. Renters make up 5% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 4%
Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,053
Renter share4.9%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$227,841
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
3
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
5
th percentile
Very Low
National
3
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Haworth and the region
Centroid at 40.9627, -73.9975 · click any tract to drill in
Why Haworth scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Haworth
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Haworth
5.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Haworth
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Haworth
3.9
How Haworth compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 31%Household composition
- 50%Racial/ethnic minority
- 11%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 16%Grade B
- 27%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 10Total filings over 4 yrs
- 4.00%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.1%Peak (2013)
- 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 40% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.0%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.3%Food insecurity
- 3.1%SNAP enrollment
- 3.9%Transit barriers
- 5.1%No health insurance
- 12.5%Frequent mental distress
- 18.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Haworth
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Haworth, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Bergen County average of 6.3 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 9th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 34003009200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003009200?
Census tract 34003009200 in Haworth scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003009200?
3.7% of residents in tract 34003009200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,342.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003009200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 31th, minority 50th, housing 11th.
Q4
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003009200?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 10 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34003009200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.00% of renter households, peaking at 7.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5
What share of households in tract 34003009200 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 34003009200 compare to Haworth overall?
Tract 34003009200 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Haworth at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Haworth; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 34003009200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related