Neighborhood · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally
Cranbury Walk Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34023008700 ·
Middlesex County, NJ · pop 4,048 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
The Cranbury Walk area of Cranbury is where census tract 34023008700 sits, home to 4,048 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. That is riskier than about 74% of US census tracts.
About 51% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,651 a month against an average household income of $212,250 a year, roughly 9% of income at the averages. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 5%Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,413
Renter share10.8%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$212,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cranbury Walk
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cranbury
Moderate
Within county
8th percentile
#177 of 192 tracts In Middlesex County
Very Low
Within state
13th percentile
#1,898 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cranbury and the region
Centroid at 40.3135, -74.5202 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cranbury Walk scores 1.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cranbury
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,651 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cranbury
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cranbury
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cranbury
3.0
How Cranbury Walk compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
6%Socioeconomic
13%Household composition
44%Racial/ethnic minority
21%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
10Total filings over 1 yrs
5.10%Avg annual filing rate
5.1%Peak (2015)
10Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.1%Housing insecurity
3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
5.6%Food insecurity
2.6%SNAP enrollment
3.5%Transit barriers
4.2%No health insurance
10.9%Frequent mental distress
19.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cranbury Walk
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cranbury, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Middlesex County average of 6.4 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 9th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34023008700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34023008700?
Census tract 34023008700 in the Cranbury Walk neighborhood scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34023008700?
Median gross rent is $1,651/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34023008700?
4.0% of residents in tract 34023008700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,048.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34023008700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 13th, minority 44th, housing 21th.
Q5
Is tract 34023008700 considered part of Cranbury Walk?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34023008700 fall within Cranbury Walk (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34023008700?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 10 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 34023008700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.10% of renter households, peaking at 5.1% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34023008700 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34023008700 compare to Cranbury overall?
Tract 34023008700 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Cranbury at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cranbury; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.