Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Huber Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39049007120 · Franklin County, OH · pop 5,100 · 64% of tract blocks fall in Huber Ridge
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 39049007120 (Huber Ridge, Ohio) comes in at 4.6/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #62,954 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
23% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,506 a month while the average household earns $96,181 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,826
Renter share29.1%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$96,181
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
14
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
13
th percentile
Very Low
National
11
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Huber Ridge and the region
Centroid at 40.0895, -82.9205 · click any tract to drill in
Why Huber Ridge scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Huber Ridge
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,506 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Huber Ridge
3.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Huber Ridge
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Huber Ridge
2.7
How Huber Ridge compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 13
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 48%Household composition
- 44%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 478Total filings over 13 yrs
- 7.45%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.5%Peak (2004)
- 35Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 30% over the past 13 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 176Total filings 2020-21
- 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 2.6Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.90×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.0%Food insecurity
- 6.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 6.4%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 21.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Huber Ridge
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Huber Ridge, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Franklin County average of 5.4 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.90x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39049007120
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049007120?
Census tract 39049007120 in Huber Ridge scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39049007120?
Median gross rent is $1,506/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39049007120?
2.2% of residents in tract 39049007120 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,100.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39049007120?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 48th, minority 44th, housing 14th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049007120?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 478 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049007120 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.45% of renter households, peaking at 9.5% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 39049007120 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.90× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39049007120 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39049007120 compare to Huber Ridge overall?
Tract 39049007120 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Huber Ridge at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Huber Ridge; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related