Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally

Union Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39113110100 · Montgomery County, OH · pop 1,533 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Union

Tract 39113110100, home to 1,533 residents in Union, scores 4.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 28th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Average household income is about $114,821 a year. About 0% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 60% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 0% Owners 100%
Tract context
Occupied units575
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate0.4%
Median income$114,821

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Union
Very Low
Within county
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#146 of 156 tracts In Montgomery County
Very Low
Within state
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#2,828 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
National
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#76,223 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Union and the region

Centroid at 39.9000, -84.2509 · click any tract to drill in

Why Union scores 1.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Union
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
0.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Union
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Union
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Union
4.6

How Union compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Union risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.81.8This tracttract 110100Union: 2.42.4Unionparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 0

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 19Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 5.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.6%Peak (2008)
  • 1Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 391131101002002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2004: 1 filings (2.04/100 renter HHs)2005: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 1 filings (1.41/100 renter HHs)2007: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (5.63/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (5.63/100 renter HHs)2010: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (14.29/100 renter HHs)2014: 2 filings (7.14/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 1 filings (2.13/100 renter HHs)2018: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Union

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Union, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Montgomery County average of 5.4 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 19 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 5.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.6% of renter households in 2008.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 0th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39113110100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39113110100?

Census tract 39113110100 in Union scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 39113110100?

0.4% of residents in tract 39113110100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,533.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 39113110100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 5th, minority 8th, housing 3th.
Q4

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39113110100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 19 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 39113110100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.05% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5

What share of households in tract 39113110100 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 39113110100 compare to Union overall?

Tract 39113110100 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Union at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Union; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Union

Top eight tracts in Union ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related