Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
Hills and Dales Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39151711501 · Stark County, OH · pop 3,895 · 16% of tract blocks fall in Hills and Dales
For landlords sizing up Hills and Dales, census tract 39151711501 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.8/10. On the national scale it ranks #57,912 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,106 a month while the average household earns $74,071 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%
Stable renters 20%
Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,733
Renter share42.5%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$74,071
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
23
th percentile
Low
Within state
29
th percentile
Low
National
23
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hills and Dales and the region
Centroid at 40.8254, -81.4473 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hills and Dales scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hills and Dales
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,106 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hills and Dales
1.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hills and Dales
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hills and Dales
2.4
How Hills and Dales compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 27%Socioeconomic
- 60%Household composition
- 26%Racial/ethnic minority
- 58%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 334Total filings over 15 yrs
- 3.42%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.8%Peak (2008)
- 19Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.5%Food insecurity
- 6.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 5.9%No health insurance
- 14.2%Frequent mental distress
- 30.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hills and Dales
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 6.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hills and Dales, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Stark County average of 5.2 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 334 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 3.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.8% of renter households in 2008.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39151711501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39151711501?
Census tract 39151711501 in Hills and Dales scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39151711501?
Median gross rent is $1,106/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39151711501?
6.7% of residents in tract 39151711501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,895.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39151711501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 60th, minority 26th, housing 58th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39151711501?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 334 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 39151711501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.42% of renter households, peaking at 6.8% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 39151711501 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 39151711501 compare to Hills and Dales overall?
Tract 39151711501 scores 2.6/10, higher than the parent city of Hills and Dales at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hills and Dales; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related