Census Tract · Ranked #79,998 of 84,120 nationally
Sewickley Heights Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 42003563300 ·
Allegheny County, PA · pop 1,459 · 52% of tract blocks fall in Sewickley Heights
Census tract 42003563300 belongs to Sewickley Heights in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. It is home to 1,459 residents and scores 5.1/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 41% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 24% of renter households, a moderate level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,500 monthly, set against $179,688 in average yearly household income, roughly 10% of income at the averages. Renters make up 7% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 5%Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units587
Renter share7.2%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate1.1%
Median income$179,688
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Sewickley Heights
Moderate
Within county
3th percentile
#382 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Very Low
Within state
4th percentile
#3,312 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very Low
National
5th percentile
#79,998 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Sewickley Heights and the region
Centroid at 40.5617, -80.1463 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sewickley Heights scores 1.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sewickley Heights
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
1.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,500 rent vs county FMR
6.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sewickley Heights
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sewickley Heights
3.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sewickley Heights
4.6
How Sewickley Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
8%Socioeconomic
22%Household composition
10%Racial/ethnic minority
18%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sewickley Heights, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Allegheny County average of 5.6 and below the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 1.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.3% of renter households in 2002.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 42003563300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003563300?
Census tract 42003563300 in Sewickley Heights scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42003563300?
Median gross rent is $1,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42003563300?
1.1% of residents in tract 42003563300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,459.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42003563300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 22th, minority 10th, housing 18th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003563300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 42003563300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.30% of renter households, peaking at 1.3% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
How does tract 42003563300 compare to Sewickley Heights overall?
Tract 42003563300 scores 1.4/10, lower than the parent city of Sewickley Heights at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sewickley Heights; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 42003563300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.