Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally

Happy Hollow Eviction Risk: Lower , Central Falls

Tract 44007011200 · Providence County, RI · pop 5,462 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

The Happy Hollow neighborhood of Central Falls anchors census tract 44007011200, which lands at $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #22,073 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

45% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,184 monthly, set against $71,301 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 58% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 32% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,389
Renter share57.5%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$71,301

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Happy Hollow
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Central Falls
Very High
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#113 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Low
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#157 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Central Falls and the region

Centroid at 41.9069, -71.3892 · click any tract to drill in

Why Happy Hollow scores 2.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Central Falls
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,184 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Central Falls
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Central Falls
6.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Central Falls
4.5

How Happy Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Happy Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.62.6This tracttract 011200Central Falls: 5.85.8Central Fallsparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 71Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 3.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.4%Peak (2016)
  • 39Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 167Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.70×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2022-06-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Happy Hollow. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Happy Hollow

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Central Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Providence County average of 6.1 and in line with the Rhode Island statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.70x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007011200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007011200?

Census tract 44007011200 in the Happy Hollow neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007011200?

Median gross rent is $1,184/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007011200?

6.9% of residents in tract 44007011200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,462.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007011200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 75th, minority 46th, housing 78th.
Q5

Is tract 44007011200 considered part of Happy Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007011200 fall within Happy Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007011200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 71 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007011200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.14% of renter households, peaking at 3.4% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007011200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.70× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007011200 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007011200 compare to Central Falls overall?

Tract 44007011200 scores 2.6/10, lower than the parent city of Central Falls at 5.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Central Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007011200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Central Falls

Top eight tracts in Central Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related