Census Tract · Ranked #79,998 of 84,120 nationally
Walden Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 47065011003 ·
Hamilton County, TN · pop 3,651 · 28% of tract blocks fall in Walden
Here is how census tract 47065011003, in Walden, looks to a landlord: a 3.3/10 eviction-risk score (Lower tier) across a population of 3,651. That is riskier than roughly 4% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 18% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,444 a month against an average household income of $122,500 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 9%Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,386
Renter share10.6%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$122,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Walden
Moderate
Within county
2th percentile
#85 of 87 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
4th percentile
#1,635 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Very Low
National
5th percentile
#79,998 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Walden and the region
Centroid at 35.2151, -85.3013 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walden scores 1.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Walden
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,444 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walden
2.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walden
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walden
2.7
How Walden compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 5.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Walden, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 4.3 and below the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 7th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 47065011003
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065011003?
Census tract 47065011003 in Walden scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47065011003?
Median gross rent is $1,444/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47065011003?
2.2% of residents in tract 47065011003 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,651.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47065011003?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 57th, minority 15th, housing 5th.
Q5
How does tract 47065011003 compare to Walden overall?
Tract 47065011003 scores 1.4/10, lower than the parent city of Walden at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walden; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.