Census Tract · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally
Shadybrook Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48073950202 ·
Cherokee, TX · pop 4,445 · 64% of tract blocks fall in Shadybrook
For landlords sizing up Shadybrook, census tract 48073950202 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. That is riskier than about 13% of US census tracts.
26% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,093 a month while the average household earns $74,028 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 27%Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,691
Renter share36.3%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$74,028
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Shadybrook
Moderate
Within county
15th percentile
#12 of 14 tracts In Cherokee
Very Low
Within state
30th percentile
#4,855 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
29th percentile
#60,063 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Shadybrook and the region
Centroid at 32.1100, -95.3483 · click any tract to drill in
Why Shadybrook scores 2.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Shadybrook
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.2
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,093 rent vs county FMR
6.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Shadybrook
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Shadybrook
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Shadybrook
4.9
How Shadybrook compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 56
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 6.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Shadybrook, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cherokee County average of 4.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48073950202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48073950202?
Census tract 48073950202 in Shadybrook scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48073950202?
Median gross rent is $1,093/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48073950202?
9.9% of residents in tract 48073950202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,445.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48073950202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 92th, minority 40th, housing 25th.
Q5
How does tract 48073950202 compare to Shadybrook overall?
Tract 48073950202 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Shadybrook at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Shadybrook; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.