Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Coppell Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48113014120 · Dallas, TX · pop 5,430 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Coppell

Here is how census tract 48113014120, in Coppell in Dallas County, looks to a landlord: a 4.9/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 5,430. It lands near the 34th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 33% of renter households, a high level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,184 a month against an average household income of $154,643 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 10% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 7% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,860
Renter share10.3%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$154,643

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Coppell
Very Low
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#641 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within state
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#6,584 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#81,634 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Coppell and the region

Centroid at 32.9608, -96.9670 · click any tract to drill in

Why Coppell scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Coppell
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,184 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Coppell
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Coppell
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Coppell
3.4

How Coppell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Coppell risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 014120Coppell: 2.02.0Coppellparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 76Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 3.21%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.8%Peak (2005)
  • 1Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130141202000: 2 filings (1.54/100 renter HHs)2001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 1 filings (0.77/100 renter HHs)2003: 2 filings (1.54/100 renter HHs)2004: 8 filings (6.15/100 renter HHs)2005: 9 filings (7.76/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (2.59/100 renter HHs)2007: 4 filings (3.45/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (5.17/100 renter HHs)2009: 6 filings (5.17/100 renter HHs)2010: 4 filings (2.88/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)2013: 3 filings (1.37/100 renter HHs)2014: 9 filings (4.11/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 1 filings (0.57/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 16Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.67×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Coppell

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Coppell, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Dallas County average of 5.2 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 76 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 3.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.8% of renter households in 2005.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 8th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113014120

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113014120?

Census tract 48113014120 in Coppell scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113014120?

Median gross rent is $2,184/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113014120?

1.8% of residents in tract 48113014120 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,430.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113014120?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 64th, minority 59th, housing 2th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113014120?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 76 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 48113014120 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.21% of renter households, peaking at 7.8% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113014120 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113014120 compare to Coppell overall?

Tract 48113014120 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Coppell at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Coppell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Coppell

Top eight tracts in Coppell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related