Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #78,212 of 84,120 nationally

Coppell Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48113014135 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,768

How risky is Coppell for landlords? Census tract 48113014135 scores 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 48% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,733 a month against an average household income of $121,157 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 24% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,653
Renter share47.2%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$121,157

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 8 tracts In Coppell
High
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#624 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within state
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#6,307 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#78,212 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Coppell and the region

Centroid at 32.9736, -96.9825 · click any tract to drill in

Why Coppell scores 1.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Coppell
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,733 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Coppell
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Coppell
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Coppell
3.4

How Coppell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Coppell risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.61.6This tracttract 014135Coppell: 2.02.0Coppellparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 20

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 324Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 4.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.0%Peak (2003)
  • 27Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130141352000: 9 filings (2.62/100 renter HHs)2001: 16 filings (4.65/100 renter HHs)2002: 20 filings (5.82/100 renter HHs)2003: 55 filings (15.99/100 renter HHs)2004: 21 filings (6.11/100 renter HHs)2005: 20 filings (6.90/100 renter HHs)2006: 45 filings (15.53/100 renter HHs)2007: 14 filings (4.83/100 renter HHs)2008: 12 filings (4.14/100 renter HHs)2009: 12 filings (4.14/100 renter HHs)2010: 17 filings (2.56/100 renter HHs)2011: 22 filings (2.36/100 renter HHs)2012: 15 filings (1.61/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (0.75/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (0.11/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (0.43/100 renter HHs)2016: 7 filings (0.80/100 renter HHs)2017: 27 filings (3.08/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 200% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 50Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.47×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Coppell

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Coppell, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Dallas County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 324 eviction filings here over 18 tracked years, with about 4.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 16.0% of renter households in 2003.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 20th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113014135

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113014135?

Census tract 48113014135 in Coppell scores 1.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113014135?

Median gross rent is $1,733/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113014135?

5.6% of residents in tract 48113014135 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,768.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113014135?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 54th, minority 75th, housing 13th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113014135?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 324 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113014135 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.58% of renter households, peaking at 16.0% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113014135 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.47× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113014135 compare to Coppell overall?

Tract 48113014135 scores 1.6/10, lower than the parent city of Coppell at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Coppell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Coppell

Top eight tracts in Coppell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related