Census Tract · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
East Mountain Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48459950700 ·
Upshur, TX · pop 5,204 · 27% of tract blocks fall in East Mountain
Census tract 48459950700 sits in East Mountain, Texas eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.4/10. That is riskier than about 19% of US census tracts.
About 35% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,113 a month while the average household earns $87,656 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 10% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 7%Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,129
Renter share10.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$87,656
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In East Mountain
Moderate
Within county
0th percentile
#10 of 10 tracts In Upshur
Very Low
Within state
23th percentile
#5,298 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
23th percentile
#65,113 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across East Mountain and the region
Centroid at 32.6348, -94.8478 · click any tract to drill in
Why East Mountain scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from East Mountain
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
1.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,113 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from East Mountain
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from East Mountain
5.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from East Mountain
5.5
How East Mountain compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from East Mountain, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Upshur County average of 4.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 31st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48459950700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48459950700?
Census tract 48459950700 in East Mountain scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48459950700?
Median gross rent is $1,113/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48459950700?
9.9% of residents in tract 48459950700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,204.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48459950700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 25th, minority 29th, housing 18th.
Q5
How does tract 48459950700 compare to East Mountain overall?
Tract 48459950700 scores 2.6/10, right in line with the parent city of East Mountain at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from East Mountain; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.