Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally
Falling Water Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 47065010434 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 2,755 · 47% of tract blocks fall in Falling Water
Falling Water in Hamilton County anchors census tract 47065010434, which lands at 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 3% of US census tracts.
23% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,057 a month against an average household income of $104,118 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 14% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,006
Renter share13.9%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate6.0%
Median income$104,118
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
9
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
9
th percentile
Very Low
National
12
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Falling Water and the region
Centroid at 35.1921, -85.2615 · click any tract to drill in
Why Falling Water scores 2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Falling Water
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
6.0% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,057 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Falling Water
1.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Falling Water
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Falling Water
2.0
How Falling Water compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 25%Socioeconomic
- 29%Household composition
- 8%Racial/ethnic minority
- 41%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Falling Water
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 2.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Falling Water, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 4.3 and below the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 47065010434
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065010434?
Census tract 47065010434 in Falling Water scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47065010434?
Median gross rent is $1,057/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47065010434?
6.0% of residents in tract 47065010434 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,755.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47065010434?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 29th, minority 8th, housing 41th.
Q5
How does tract 47065010434 compare to Falling Water overall?
Tract 47065010434 scores 2/10, right in line with the parent city of Falling Water at 1.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Falling Water; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related